Self-driving tech going nowhere as rules stall under US President Donald Trump

KEVIN LAMARQUE/REUTERS

US President Donald Trump has refused to mandate the installation of V2V technology in new vehicles. The technology isn’t effective unless most cars have it.

The technology that gives cars superpowers to see around corners and through walls won’t be on the first self-driving rides hitting the road in the next few years.

Vehicle-to-vehicle communication systems, known as V2V, are regarded as essential for fully automated travel, which could dramatically reduce traffic fatalities from around 40,000 in the US last year.

The tech enables cars to send signals back and forth to one another, improving their ability to foresee potential collisions and avert them.

General Motors, Tesla, Daimler, Alphabet's Waymo and others have promised autonomous models will hit the road over the ...

BENOIT TESSIER/REUTERS

General Motors, Tesla, Daimler, Alphabet’s Waymo and others have promised autonomous models will hit the road over the next few years.

Despite its promise, the tech is going nowhere fast. A push by regulators during the Obama administration to speed V2V to market has stalled under the administration of President Donald Trump. 

READ MORE:
* NZ’s first self-drive vehicle demo begins
* Uber suspends testing of self-driving cars
* The frenzy over self-driving cars is palpable
* Self-driving shuttles to be made in Christchurch

Former US president Barack Obama proposed to equip all new cars with V2V transponders.

Former US president Barack Obama proposed to equip all new cars with V2V transponders.

Without rules requiring it, US-based automakers including Ford are holding off on deploying US$350 (NZ$479)-per-vehicle systems that aren’t effective unless most cars have them. 

“Unless it gets mandated, nobody is going to put it on their cars,” said Glen De Vos, chief technology officer at Delphi Automotive Plc, a supplier of autonomous-driving systems.

“As we meet with regulators, we continue to pound the drum and tell them these early-warning systems in V2V communications have huge safety benefits.”

US Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao: "There will be a competitive process in which those projects that have greater ...

KEVIN LAMARQUE/REUTERS

US Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao: “There will be a competitive process in which those projects that have greater innovation and are more forward looking will have a larger share of our federal dollars.”

The race is on to get self-driving cars on the road. General Motors, Tesla, Daimler, Alphabet’s Waymo and others have promised autonomous models will hit the highway over the next few years.

The first ones – expected to be robot-taxis, commuter shuttles and driverless delivery vehicles – will be guided by sensors embedded on board the cars. Without V2V, the views from those cameras, ultrasonic and laser-radar sensors only go as far as the eye can see.

‘SIXTH SENSE’

The US's National Transportation Safety Board has reiterated its recommendation for mandatory V2V technology.

YOUTUBE

The US’s National Transportation Safety Board has reiterated its recommendation for mandatory V2V technology.

V2V transponders rely on Wi-Fi and may eventually use 5G cellular signals. They aren’t constrained by obstacles like neighbouring trucks or buildings.

“This connectivity is like your car’s sixth sense,” said Huei Peng, director of the University of Michigan’s Mcity autonomous test track, who demonstrated this technology to Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao last week.

Achieving the highest level of automation – what auto engineers call Level 5 autonomy – requires V2V, said Kay Stepper, vice president and regional head of automated driving for German supplier Robert Bosch.

On-board sensors on current driverless cars can only sustain Level 4 autonomy, where vehicles travel in restricted areas or under limited conditions.

A self-driving vehicle “has to be able to deal with any traffic situation it’s thrown into”, Stepper said. “That’s why we need V2V.”

An Obama administration proposal to equip all new cars with V2V transponders has been put on the back burner by the Trump administration.

After having eased federal guidelines for testing autonomous vehicles and moving to slash rules elsewhere, industry executives say it’s unlikely the administration will mandate the technology.

GOVERNMENT’S STANCE

Officials from the Transportation Department declined to discuss the status of V2V regulations at the event last week where Chao unveiled updated US autonomous testing guidelines.

Chao suggested state and local governments bear responsibility for deploying communication devices in stop lights and road signs, though she said Trump’s plan to rebuild infrastructure will include federal incentives to encourage new tech.

“There will be a competitive process in which those projects that have greater innovation and are more forward looking will have a larger share of our federal dollars,” Chao said. “The technology will determine the trend.”

For now, V2V is mired in regulatory review in the US. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration hasn’t signalled its next step on the proposed mandate, which has been supported by safety advocates, automakers including GM, and suppliers trying to sell the systems.

The National Transportation Safety Board, which last week said shortcomings in Tesla’s Autopilot system contributed to a fatal 2016 crash, reiterated its recommendation made to NHTSA three years ago that it require V2V technology.

V2V DETRACTORS

Free-market groups and other carmakers, including Tesla, have criticised a mandate in part because it could force a particular V2V tech on the industry while ignoring newer alternatives.

The chasm could give the Trump administration cover to abandon the rule, as it has other Obama-era initiatives, according to Marc Scribner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market think-tank in Washington.

“The only action I can see would be a formal withdrawal of the rule,” Scribner said.

The Obama administration’s proposal had set a timeline to install V2V technology on all cars, SUVs and light trucks by 2023, using the same federal safety standards dictating that vehicles have rear-view mirrors and brake lights.

“But this is now in the slow lane,” said Peng, the director at U-M’s test track. “I have no idea when it will happen.”

‘WE NEED A LITTLE HELP’

Some automakers are still eager to deploy the tech. GM outfitted its Cadillac CTS model with V2V communications earlier this year, hoping it would spur others to follow. No one has yet.

“We really do need a little help from the government,” said Matthew Kirsch, GM’s engineering group manager for automated driving and active safety, who’s been lobbying federal and state regulators to gain support for the technology.

Ken Washington, Ford’s chief technology officer, called V2V “very important to safety”, but said that “everybody has to do it”.

A challenge for proponents of V2V is the dearth of consumer demand for tech that doesn’t work until it’s widespread on the roadways. Auto companies likely would have to bear the expense of outfitting their cars with communication transponders.

“It’s all about cost,” said Kristin Schondorf, executive director of automotive and transportation mobility at consultant EY. “At the moment, there is no logical reason for a customer to pay money to put that on their car. So the return on investment is zero.”

FUTURE DOUBTFUL

Rollout is another roadblock for V2V. With more than 250 million cars on the road in the US – and 1.2 billion worldwide – it would take decades to outfit every vehicle with the technology.

The first year of a federal mandate, new models embedded with the tech would represent only about 7 per cent of cars on US roads.

That’s why the first deployments of V2V could come in commercial or government applications. Cities may decide to embed the devices in their stop lights and public buses. Delivery companies might embed transponders in their trucks and in roadway signs and signals along heavily travelled routes.

But even those limited deployments will require rules of the road from regulators. Until that happens, V2V’s future remains in doubt.

“It makes a lot of sense, but it seems pretty stalled,” said Mark Wakefield, head of the automotive practice at consultant AlixPartners.

“It really has to be mandated to get the full safety benefit. At this point, I’d say the jury is out on V2V.”


 – Bloomberg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

two × 5 =