Wednesday Sector Laggards: Consumer Products, Technology & Communications

The worst performing sector as of midday Wednesday is the Consumer Products sector, showing a 0.8% loss. Within that group, General Mills, Inc. (Symbol: GIS) and Under Armour Inc (Symbol: UA) are two of the day’s laggards, showing a loss of 6.0% and 3.6%, respectively. Among consumer products ETFs , one ETF following the sector is the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (Symbol: IYK), which is down 0.6% on the day, and up 10.99% year-to-date. General Mills, Inc., meanwhile, is down 13.39% year-to-date, and Under Armour Inc, is down 39.85% year-to-date. Combined, GIS and UA make up approximately 1.5% of the underlying holdings of IYK.

The next worst performing sector is the Technology & Communications sector, showing a 0.8% loss. Among large Technology & Communications stocks, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (Symbol: SWKS) and Western Digital Corp (Symbol: WDC) are the most notable, showing a loss of 4.9% and 4.9%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Technology & Communications stocks is the Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF ( XLK ), which is down 0.6% in midday trading, and up 22.64% on a year-to-date basis. Skyworks Solutions, Inc., meanwhile, is up 38.60% year-to-date, and Western Digital Corp is up 27.34% year-to-date. Combined, SWKS and WDC make up approximately 0.9% of the underlying holdings of XLK.

Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:



Here’s a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Wednesday. As you can see, four sectors are up on the day, while five sectors are down.

Sector % Change
Energy +1.4%
Industrial +0.5%
Financial +0.3%
Materials +0.2%
Services -0.1%
Healthcare -0.1%
Utilities -0.7%
Consumer Products -0.8%
Technology & Communications -0.8%

25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs ยป


The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

two × 2 =