Home Mortgage DRAT Upholds CSB’s Prior Charge, Sets Aside Punjab & Sind Bank’s SARFAESI Sale [Read Order]
Mortgage

DRAT Upholds CSB’s Prior Charge, Sets Aside Punjab & Sind Bank’s SARFAESI Sale [Read Order]

Share


The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai, has dismissed appeals filed by Punjab & Sind Bank (PSB) and an auction purchaser, upholding a prior mortgage held by Catholic Syrian Bank(CSB) and setting aside a SARFAESI sale conducted by Punjab & Sind Bank.

The dispute originated from competing claims over the same property by two banks, which had extended loans to M/s. Supreme Chemiplast Pipings Pvt. Ltd. The Catholic Syrian Bank (CSB) claimed its mortgage, created in 1994 with the original title deeds, was prior in time. Punjab & Sind Bank (PSB) later initiated SARFAESI proceedings in 2007 and sold the property to T.N. Rajakumar. Subsequently, CSB, through its DRT proceedings, attached and sold the same property to S. Ramakrishnan, leading to conflicting claims.

Complete practical guide to Drafting Commercial Contracts, Click Here

The core issue before the DRAT was the validity and priority of the two mortgages. PSB and Rajakumar contended that the SARFAESI sale was legally concluded and that Rajakumar was a bonafide purchaser. CSB argued that its mortgage was the first and only valid one, created with original documents, whereas PSB’s mortgage was defective as it was based on copies of the title deeds obtained through misrepresentation.

JusticeG. Chandrasekharan, Chairperson of the Tribunal, observed that an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds requires the original documents. The Tribunal found that CSB’s mortgage was validly created with the original sale deed. In contrast, it was established that PSB’s mortgage was created using only a copy of the title deed, and the mortgagor had falsely affirmed it was the original.

The Tribunal noted that PSB had even been forewarned about potential fraud but proceeded with the loan. Consequently, the SARFAESI action initiated by PSB on the basis of this defective mortgage was held to be illegal. The DRAT dismissed the appeals and upheld the sale conducted by the Catholic Syrian Bank in favour of S. Ramakrishnan.

Punjab & Sind Bank vs The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal , M.A. 22/2016 , 23 October 2025

Punjab & Sind Bank vs The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal

Case Number :  M.A. 22/2016Date of Judgement :  23 October 2025



Source link

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don't Miss

Current ARM mortgage rates report for April 2, 2026

Homeowners with some tolerance for uncertainty might find that an adjustable-rate mortgage is worth considering as a way to get a low introductory...

Your Beginner’s Guide to Millibitcoin Value and Micro-Investing| KuCoin

Introduction: The Small Slice of Digital Gold Bitcoin (BTC) has dominated global financial discourse since its inception. For many newcomers and those observing...

Related Articles

Fire Insurance Claims: Supreme Court Says Cause of Fire Is Irrelevant Unless Insured Acted Deliberately

The Supreme Court has held that when damage is caused by fire,...

Mortgage costs rise again as housing market momentum slows

Mortgage rates are expected to stay elevated for 'some time yet' despite...

Chandler’s Ford firm warns student loans may impact mortgages

Michaela Johns, director and education sector specialist at Chandler’s Ford-based HWB Chartered...

Why the simplest mortgage cases may no longer sustain broker firms

“If a broker’s value proposition is limited to facilitating simple product switches,...