Home Mortgage DRAT Upholds CSB’s Prior Charge, Sets Aside Punjab & Sind Bank’s SARFAESI Sale [Read Order]
Mortgage

DRAT Upholds CSB’s Prior Charge, Sets Aside Punjab & Sind Bank’s SARFAESI Sale [Read Order]

Share


The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai, has dismissed appeals filed by Punjab & Sind Bank (PSB) and an auction purchaser, upholding a prior mortgage held by Catholic Syrian Bank(CSB) and setting aside a SARFAESI sale conducted by Punjab & Sind Bank.

The dispute originated from competing claims over the same property by two banks, which had extended loans to M/s. Supreme Chemiplast Pipings Pvt. Ltd. The Catholic Syrian Bank (CSB) claimed its mortgage, created in 1994 with the original title deeds, was prior in time. Punjab & Sind Bank (PSB) later initiated SARFAESI proceedings in 2007 and sold the property to T.N. Rajakumar. Subsequently, CSB, through its DRT proceedings, attached and sold the same property to S. Ramakrishnan, leading to conflicting claims.

Complete practical guide to Drafting Commercial Contracts, Click Here

The core issue before the DRAT was the validity and priority of the two mortgages. PSB and Rajakumar contended that the SARFAESI sale was legally concluded and that Rajakumar was a bonafide purchaser. CSB argued that its mortgage was the first and only valid one, created with original documents, whereas PSB’s mortgage was defective as it was based on copies of the title deeds obtained through misrepresentation.

JusticeG. Chandrasekharan, Chairperson of the Tribunal, observed that an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds requires the original documents. The Tribunal found that CSB’s mortgage was validly created with the original sale deed. In contrast, it was established that PSB’s mortgage was created using only a copy of the title deed, and the mortgagor had falsely affirmed it was the original.

The Tribunal noted that PSB had even been forewarned about potential fraud but proceeded with the loan. Consequently, the SARFAESI action initiated by PSB on the basis of this defective mortgage was held to be illegal. The DRAT dismissed the appeals and upheld the sale conducted by the Catholic Syrian Bank in favour of S. Ramakrishnan.

Punjab & Sind Bank vs The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal , M.A. 22/2016 , 23 October 2025

Punjab & Sind Bank vs The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal

Case Number :  M.A. 22/2016Date of Judgement :  23 October 2025



Source link

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don't Miss

4 Top Crypto Coins Gearing Up for the Next Bull Run

The crypto market moves fast, and the next cycle already has serious momentum behind it. Traders who want real results are looking beyond...

Diebold Nixdorf stock hits record highs on S&P SmallCap 600 inclusion – Investing.com UK

Diebold Nixdorf stock hits record highs on S&P SmallCap 600 inclusion  Investing.com UK Source link

Related Articles

Res Judicata and Cause of Action: Insights from Ramaswami Aiyar v. Vythinatha Aiyar: Madras High Court

Introduction The case of Ramaswami Aiyar And Anr. v. Vythinatha Aiyar And...

Mortgage rates dos and don’ts that borrowers should know now

Borrowers will need to take a strategic approach in today's elevated mortgage...

Mortgage Rate History: 1970s To 2026

Key takeaways As of June 3, 2026, the average rate for a...