Home Mortgage DRAT Upholds CSB’s Prior Charge, Sets Aside Punjab & Sind Bank’s SARFAESI Sale [Read Order]
Mortgage

DRAT Upholds CSB’s Prior Charge, Sets Aside Punjab & Sind Bank’s SARFAESI Sale [Read Order]

Share


The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai, has dismissed appeals filed by Punjab & Sind Bank (PSB) and an auction purchaser, upholding a prior mortgage held by Catholic Syrian Bank(CSB) and setting aside a SARFAESI sale conducted by Punjab & Sind Bank.

The dispute originated from competing claims over the same property by two banks, which had extended loans to M/s. Supreme Chemiplast Pipings Pvt. Ltd. The Catholic Syrian Bank (CSB) claimed its mortgage, created in 1994 with the original title deeds, was prior in time. Punjab & Sind Bank (PSB) later initiated SARFAESI proceedings in 2007 and sold the property to T.N. Rajakumar. Subsequently, CSB, through its DRT proceedings, attached and sold the same property to S. Ramakrishnan, leading to conflicting claims.

Complete practical guide to Drafting Commercial Contracts, Click Here

The core issue before the DRAT was the validity and priority of the two mortgages. PSB and Rajakumar contended that the SARFAESI sale was legally concluded and that Rajakumar was a bonafide purchaser. CSB argued that its mortgage was the first and only valid one, created with original documents, whereas PSB’s mortgage was defective as it was based on copies of the title deeds obtained through misrepresentation.

JusticeG. Chandrasekharan, Chairperson of the Tribunal, observed that an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds requires the original documents. The Tribunal found that CSB’s mortgage was validly created with the original sale deed. In contrast, it was established that PSB’s mortgage was created using only a copy of the title deed, and the mortgagor had falsely affirmed it was the original.

The Tribunal noted that PSB had even been forewarned about potential fraud but proceeded with the loan. Consequently, the SARFAESI action initiated by PSB on the basis of this defective mortgage was held to be illegal. The DRAT dismissed the appeals and upheld the sale conducted by the Catholic Syrian Bank in favour of S. Ramakrishnan.

Punjab & Sind Bank vs The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal , M.A. 22/2016 , 23 October 2025

Punjab & Sind Bank vs The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal

Case Number :  M.A. 22/2016Date of Judgement :  23 October 2025



Source link

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don't Miss

Regulators against bankers, insurers trading in commodities: Tuhin Kanta Pandey

Mumbai: India's banking and insurance regulators are against allowing lenders and insurers to trade in commodity markets, said Tuhin Kanta Pandey, chairman of...

How The Investment Story Is Shifting For Gamma Communications (LSE:GAMA) After Target Cut

Make better investment decisions with Simply Wall St's easy, visual tools that give you a competitive edge. The latest update on Gamma Communications...

Related Articles

How a simple trick could save you money on your mortgage repayments | Personal Finance | Finance

Looking for a way to cut down on your mortgage costs? A...

Mortgage and refinance interest rates today, May 20, 2026: 30-year fixed hits highest rate since August ’25

All forms of conventional mortgage rates are up today compared to yesterday,...

West One allows borrowers to take 5.5 times income

West One Loans, the specialist property lender, has today announced that...

Closed-end home equity loans gain ground on HELOCs

Closed-end home equity loan annual growth outpaced its line of credit cousin...